From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greate Bay Hotel Casino v. Chan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 27, 1997
239 A.D.2d 295 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 27, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Arber, J.).


Since defendant made the payments, albeit, at times, in an untimely fashion, required by the judgment plaintiff obtained against her in New Jersey, the IAS Court properly exercised its discretion in vacating the restraint on defendant's bank accounts and safe deposit boxes. ( See, Guardian Loan Co. v. Early, 47 N.Y.2d 515, 519.) The court, however, was without jurisdiction to preclude plaintiff from executing on or forcing the sale of real property owned by defendant which is located in New Jersey or to otherwise limit plaintiff in its assertion of rights with respect to a lien on that property.


Summaries of

Greate Bay Hotel Casino v. Chan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 27, 1997
239 A.D.2d 295 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Greate Bay Hotel Casino v. Chan

Case Details

Full title:GREATE BAY HOTEL CASINO, Appellant, v. ANGELA CHAN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 27, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 295 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 424

Citing Cases

Ringel v. Ringel

B. Ringel gifted this property to his wife directly (see NYSCEF Doc. No. 9, ¶¶ 31-32 [alleging that B. Ringel…