From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grayned v. Citibank, N.A.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Feb 16, 2012
NO. 02-11-00325-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 16, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 02-11-00325-CV

02-16-2012

SHERRY GRAYNED APPELLANT v. CITIBANK, N.A. APPELLEE


FROM THE 342ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On January 20, 2012, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Grayned v. Citibank, N.A.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Feb 16, 2012
NO. 02-11-00325-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Grayned v. Citibank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:SHERRY GRAYNED APPELLANT v. CITIBANK, N.A. APPELLEE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Feb 16, 2012

Citations

NO. 02-11-00325-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 16, 2012)