From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Bisbee

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 31, 2018
No. 76218 (Nev. App. Jul. 31, 2018)

Opinion

No. 76218

07-31-2018

MALCOLM GRAY, Petitioner, v. CONNIE S. BISBEE; AND THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondents.


ORDER DENYING PETITION

This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges the Board of Parole Commissioners' denial of parole for Malcom Gray in 1999, 2003, 2005, 2008, and 2011. We have considered the petition, and we are not satisfied this court's intervention by way of extraordinary writ is warranted. See NRS 34.160; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioner[ ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Although it appears the Board may have considered incorrect information when determining whether to grant Gray parole in the past, because Gray was granted parole to his consecutive sentence in 2014 and we cannot grant retroactive parole, there is no relief we could grant. Accordingly, we

The record before this court demonstrates that in response to a letter for reconsideration sent by Gray in 2018, the Board acknowledged the improper information and agreed to remove it from the aggravating factors. --------

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Malcolm Gray

Attorney General/Carson City

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Gray v. Bisbee

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 31, 2018
No. 76218 (Nev. App. Jul. 31, 2018)
Case details for

Gray v. Bisbee

Case Details

Full title:MALCOLM GRAY, Petitioner, v. CONNIE S. BISBEE; AND THE STATE OF NEVADA…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 31, 2018

Citations

No. 76218 (Nev. App. Jul. 31, 2018)