From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gragg v. Nickrenz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Sep 17, 2015
Civil No. 15-2718 (DWF/FLN) (D. Minn. Sep. 17, 2015)

Opinion

Civil No. 15-2718 (DWF/FLN)

09-17-2015

Kenneth Gragg, Plaintiff, v. C. Nickrenz, Warden, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated July 30, 2015. (Doc. No. 3.) No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. The Report and Recommendation addresses Petitioner's writ of habeas corpus, brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge concluded that Petitioner's argument that the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") abused its discretion by denying his request for a reduction of time in custody following his completion of a substance abuse program had no merit because "lawfully promulgated federal regulations prohibit the BOP from reducing the time in custody of federal prisoners incarcerated for illegally possessing firearms, and thus the BOP could not have abused its discretion in denying [Petitioner] relief." (Doc. No. 3 at 1.)

Section 2241 applies to challenges to the manner in which the sentence is being administered. See Matheny v. Morrison, 307 F.3d 709, 711 (8th Cir. 2002) (explaining that "[a] petitioner may attack the execution of his sentence through § 2241 in the district where he is incarcerated"); see also Swehla v. Wilson, Civ. No. 13-1919, 2013 WL 6190379, at *7 (D. Minn. Nov. 27, 2013) (citation omitted). Further, as the Magistrate Judge states: "Although [Petitioner] seeks relief under § 2241, the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases nevertheless apply here. See Rule 1(b)." (Doc. No. 3 at 1 n.1.) --------

The undersigned agrees with the Magistrate Judge's determination that the Petitioner is not entitled to relief because the BOP was acting in accordance with federal regulations when denying Petitioner's request for early release. Accordingly, based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following:

ORDER

1. Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel's July 30, 2015 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. [3]) is ADOPTED.

2. Petitioner Kenneth Gragg's petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. [1]) is DENIED.

3. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: September 17, 2015

s/Donovan W. Frank

DONOVAN W. FRANK

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Gragg v. Nickrenz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Sep 17, 2015
Civil No. 15-2718 (DWF/FLN) (D. Minn. Sep. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Gragg v. Nickrenz

Case Details

Full title:Kenneth Gragg, Plaintiff, v. C. Nickrenz, Warden, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Sep 17, 2015

Citations

Civil No. 15-2718 (DWF/FLN) (D. Minn. Sep. 17, 2015)