From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gorton v. Williams

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Aug 12, 2008
Case No. CIV-07-1165-F (W.D. Okla. Aug. 12, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-07-1165-F.

August 12, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff Glenn H. Gorton, a prisoner appearing pro se and in forma pauperis whose pleadings are liberally construed, sues under federal law.

Three Reports and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Robert E. Bacharach are before the court: the Report and Recommendation of June 27, 2008 (doc. no. 67); and two Reports and Recommendations of July 7, 2008 (doc. nos. 68, 69). (The three Reports are collectively referred to in this order as "the Reports.") In the Report at doc. no. 67, the Magistrate Judge recommends that plaintiff's requests for judgment against the Lawton Correctional Facility and Floyd Fry (doc. nos. 48, 56, 61) be denied. In the Report at doc. no. 68, the Magistrate Judge recommends that plaintiff's motion for retaliation (doc. no. 45) be construed as a motion for a preliminary injunction and that relief be denied. In the Report at doc. no. 69, the Magistrate Judge recommends that defendant Williams' motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 39) be granted based on a failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

Before addressing the Reports, the court notes that after the termination of the referral, plaintiff filed a "Motion for Injunction for Lawton Correctional Facility" (doc. no. 71). The motion seeks "to make Lawton Correctional Facility Law Library supply all the needed state and federal statute[s], case laws . . . [and Department of Corrections and Lawton Correctional Facility] policies needed to do any and all legal and departmental cases." No response was filed. The motion does not meet the requirements for injunctive relief, and plaintiff has not shown he was hindered in this litigation due to denial of access to legal materials. Plaintiff's "Motion for Injunction for Lawton Correctional Facility" is DENIED.

Plaintiff has objected to each of the three Reports. As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court has reviewed all objected to matters de novo. Having concluded that review, and after careful consideration of plaintiff's objections, the record, and the relevant authorities, the court finds that it agrees with each of the Reports of the Magistrate Judge and that no purpose would be served by stating any further analysis here.

Accordingly, plaintiff's objections to the Reports are DENIED, and the Reports of Magistrate Judge Bacharach are each ACCEPTED, ADOPTED, and AFFIRMED in their entirety. Plaintiff's requests for judgment against the Lawton Correctional Facility and Floyd Fry are DENIED. Plaintiff's motion for retaliation construed as a motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED. Defendant Williams' motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 39) is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Gorton v. Williams

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Aug 12, 2008
Case No. CIV-07-1165-F (W.D. Okla. Aug. 12, 2008)
Case details for

Gorton v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:GLENN H. GORTON, Plaintiff, v. C/O WILLIAMS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Aug 12, 2008

Citations

Case No. CIV-07-1165-F (W.D. Okla. Aug. 12, 2008)