From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gore v. Newsom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 14, 2021
2:21-CV-1189-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-CV-1189-DMC-P

07-14-2021

SAMUEL LEE GORE, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, Defendant.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

The Court notes that Plaintiff's trust account indicates that he has $930.90 in his account, that Plaintiff is employed in prison and receives monthly deposits, and that Plaintiff concedes that he receives $1, 200 a month in retirement benefit. ECF Nos. 3 at 1-2; 8 at 1. Plaintiff, however, avers that his retired wife depends upon Plaintiff's income to meet all of her expenses. See ECF No. 3 at 2. According to Plaintiff, he sends his wife everything that he earns. Id. On the whole, then, considering guiding case law and Plaintiff's contentions, the Court concludes that Plaintiff has satisfied 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

Plaintiff earns pay at a rate of eighty cents an hour. ECF No. 3 at 1. Plaintiff's trust account reflects monthly income. ECF No. 8 at 1. Deposits into Plaintiff's account over the last few months have commonly approached or exceeded $150. Id.

Considering all of the above, Plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gore v. Newsom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 14, 2021
2:21-CV-1189-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Gore v. Newsom

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL LEE GORE, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 14, 2021

Citations

2:21-CV-1189-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2021)