From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Good v. Trish

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 24, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-1736 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 24, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-1736.

March 24, 2008


ORDER


AND NOW, this 24th day of March, 2008, upon consideration of pro se plaintiff's motion to compel (Doc. 46) and the accompanying brief in support (Doc. 47), and it appearing that the brief in support contains impertinent or scandalous allegations against defendant John Trish, it is hereby ORDERED that:

While the motion is styled as a motion to compel, it does not involve discovery matters and is properly considered a motion for injunction.

1. The Clerk of Court is directed to file the original brief in support (Doc. 47) under seal.
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to redact the second sentence of paragraph five from the brief in support (Doc. 47) and to file the redacted version as a separate document.


Summaries of

Good v. Trish

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 24, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-1736 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 24, 2008)
Case details for

Good v. Trish

Case Details

Full title:SANDRA L. GOOD, Plaintiff v. JOHN TRISH, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 24, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-1736 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 24, 2008)