From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Good Technology Corp. v. Mobileiron, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jun 8, 2015
5:15-cv-01694-PSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2015)

Opinion


GOOD TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and GOOD TECHNOLOGY SOFTWARE, INC., Plaintiffs, v. MOBILEIRON, INC., Defendant. No. 5:15-cv-01694-PSG United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. June 8, 2015

          AMENDED CASE SCHEDULING ORDER (Re: Docket No. 61)

          PAUL S. GREWAL, Magistrate Judge.

         Based on the parties' joint case management statement and the case management conference last week,

See Docket No. 58.

         IT IS ORDERED that the presumptive limits on discovery set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall apply to this case with the following exceptions:

• Each side may take a total of 100 hours of deposition testimony.

• Of the 100 total hours, each side may take up to 35 hours of non-party deposition testimony.

• Each side may take no more than six non-party depositions and eight party depositions.

• Each noticed 30(b)(6) deposition shall count as one party deposition, regardless of how many individuals must be deposed to cover the topics of the particular notice.

• Each side may serve up to 120 requests for production.

• The parties may request relief from these limits for good cause by letter brief.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for joinder of any additional parties, or other amendments to the pleadings, is June 22, 2015.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following schedule and deadlines shall apply to this case:

Markman

         SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Good Technology Corp. v. Mobileiron, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jun 8, 2015
5:15-cv-01694-PSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2015)
Case details for

Good Technology Corp. v. Mobileiron, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GOOD TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and GOOD TECHNOLOGY SOFTWARE, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Jun 8, 2015

Citations

5:15-cv-01694-PSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2015)