From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez-Jarrin v. New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 8, 2008
50 A.D.3d 334 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 3312.

April 8, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucy Billings, J.), entered on or about December 4, 2007, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in defendants' favor dismissing the complaint.

Lester Schwab Katz Dwyer, LLP, New York (Paul M. Tarr of counsel), for appellants.

Rosenberg, Minc, Falkoff Wolff, LLP, New York (Arthur O. Tisi of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Lippman, P.J., Friedman, Catterson and Moskowitz, JJ.


Defendants established prima facie their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that at the time of plaintiff's accident it had been raining or snowing for several hours, that they had placed a mat on the vestibule floor, and that they had neither actual nor constructive notice of the particular wet condition that allegedly caused plaintiff to slip ( see Garcia v Delgado Travel Agency, 4 AD3d 204). Defendants were under no obligation "to cover the entire floor with mats and to continuously mop up all tracked-in water" ( id.). In opposition, plaintiff's failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to notice ( see id.).


Summaries of

Gonzalez-Jarrin v. New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 8, 2008
50 A.D.3d 334 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Gonzalez-Jarrin v. New York

Case Details

Full title:AIDA GONZALEZ-JARRIN et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 8, 2008

Citations

50 A.D.3d 334 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 3076
855 N.Y.S.2d 87

Citing Cases

Santiago v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.

e.g. Solazzo v. New York City Tr. Auth., 6 N.Y.3d 734, 735, 810 N.Y.S.2d 121, 843 N.E.2d 748 [2005],affg.21…

SANDELL v. BD. OF MANAGERS OF PARC VENDOME CONDO.

Plaintiff highlights portions of the doorman's deposition testimony, wherein he states that he knows that the…