Gonzales Saenz v. Paramo

Full title: Robert GONZALES SAENZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. PARAMO, Officer; E.B…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 13, 2001

21 F. App'x 765 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion

21 Fed.Appx. 765 (9th Cir. 2001) Robert GONZALES SAENZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. PARAMO, Officer; E.B. Hooker, Sgt., Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-16199. D.C. No. CV-00-01429-MEJ. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. November 13, 2001

Submitted November 5, 2001. ^*

* The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Maria-Elena James, Magistrate Judge, Presiding.

Before KLEINFELD, McKEOWN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ^**

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Robert Gonzalez Saenz, a California State prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as duplicative. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. See Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n. 2 (9th Cir.1995) (holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it dismissed a complaint that merely repeated a previously litigated claim).

AFFIRMED.