In Gomes we noted that the application of the doctrine of equitable estoppel against the government is not favored, and held that the plaintiff's equitable tolling argument was without factual merit.
Summary of this case from Wiesenberg v. Univ. of Haw.No. 30005.
March 30, 2011.
Summary Dispositional Orders Affirmed.
In Gomes we noted that the application of the doctrine of equitable estoppel against the government is not favored, and held that the plaintiff's equitable tolling argument was without factual merit.
Summary of this case from Wiesenberg v. Univ. of Haw.Full title:Gomes v. State, Dept. of Public Safety
Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
Date published: Mar 30, 2011
A similar analysis would apply had Wiesenberg purported to assert a claim under the statute governing…