From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goade v. T.J. Lambrecht Cons.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jul 21, 2005
No. 02-04-190-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 21, 2005)

Opinion

No. 02-04-190-CV

Delivered: July 21, 2005.

Appeal from the 17th District Court of Tarrant County.

PANEL D: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On June 22, 2005, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a). TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

Goade v. T.J. Lambrecht Cons.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jul 21, 2005
No. 02-04-190-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 21, 2005)
Case details for

Goade v. T.J. Lambrecht Cons.

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS GOADE, Appellant, v. T.J. LAMBRECHT CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Jul 21, 2005

Citations

No. 02-04-190-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 21, 2005)