From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GILMAN v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AM

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jul 6, 1943
180 Misc. 729 (N.Y. App. Term 1943)

Opinion

July 6, 1943.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, McNULTY, J.

Matthew L. Salonger for appellant.

Weit Goldman for respondent.



MEMORANDUM


There was sufficient evidence to raise a question of fact, and although the court would be warranted in setting aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence, there being a jury there must be a new trial. ( Starr v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc., 257 A.D. 261.)

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

HAMMER, SHIENTAG and HECHT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

GILMAN v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AM

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jul 6, 1943
180 Misc. 729 (N.Y. App. Term 1943)
Case details for

GILMAN v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AM

Case Details

Full title:JACK GILMAN, Appellant, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jul 6, 1943

Citations

180 Misc. 729 (N.Y. App. Term 1943)
45 N.Y.S.2d 684

Citing Cases

Steadman v. Stoeckl

Thus, the Court deems defendant's attached correspondences as admissible. Plaintiff's opposition hinges on a…