From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Hertz Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 25, 1963
19 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

June 25, 1963


Order, entered on January 15, 1963, denying plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of an order revoking his preference under former subdivision 5 of rule V of the New York County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules, now Special Rule of the Appellate Division, First Department, regulating the granting of preferences in actions for personal injuries, effective March 1, 1962, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-appellant, and the motion granted. A preference once granted should not be revoked unless facts elicited at a pretrial conference satisfactorily show that the preference should not be continued. There was no such showing here. ( Lee v. Lehrer, 3 A.D.2d 702.) In the circumstances it was an unwise exercise of discretion to deny the motion for reconsideration. ( Sulahian v. City of New York, 19 A.D.2d 522; Murphy v. Valeray Real Estate Co., 19 A.D.2d 601.)

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.


Summaries of

Garcia v. Hertz Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 25, 1963
19 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Garcia v. Hertz Co.

Case Details

Full title:RAMON GARCIA, Appellant, v. HERTZ CO. et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 25, 1963

Citations

19 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)