From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sulahian v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 14, 1963
19 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

May 14, 1963


Order, entered on February 6, 1963, denying plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of an order revoking her preference on the Trial Calendar under former subdivision 5 of rule V of the New York County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules, now Special Rule of the Appellate Division, First Department, regulating the granting of preferences in actions for personal injuries, effective March 1, 1962, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the motion granted. To penalize plaintiff by revoking a preference theretofore granted following her failure to accept an offer consequent on a pretrial exploration of the possibility of settlement constitutes a gross abuse of discretion. ( Wolff v. Laverne, Inc., 17 A.D.2d 213.)

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Bastow, JJ.


Summaries of

Sulahian v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 14, 1963
19 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Sulahian v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ALICE SULAHIAN, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 14, 1963

Citations

19 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Citing Cases

Murphy v. Valeray Real Estate Company, Inc.

( Lee v. Lehrer, 3 A.D.2d 702.) In the circumstances it was an unwise exercise of discretion to deny the…

Mitchell v. Iowa Cab Co., Inc.

Failure to concur in what the Justice presiding may consider an adequate settlement should not result in an…