From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gamba v. Woodford

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 25, 2007
No. CIV S-05-1285 MCE JFM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1285 MCE JFM P.

September 25, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 29, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 29, 2007 are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's March 12, 2007 motion is denied.


Summaries of

Gamba v. Woodford

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 25, 2007
No. CIV S-05-1285 MCE JFM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2007)
Case details for

Gamba v. Woodford

Case Details

Full title:RAS ADISA GAMBA, Plaintiff, v. JEANNE S. WOODFORD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 25, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1285 MCE JFM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2007)

Citing Cases

Pedroza v. Pham

A number of courts have followed Rose and declined to tack disabilities. See Givens v. City and County of San…

Givens v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco

A number of courts have followed Rose and declined to tack disabilities. See Smith v. Kouri, 2011 WL 2790191,…