From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gadigian v. City of Taylor

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 28, 2010
486 Mich. 936 (Mich. 2010)

Opinion

No. 138323.

May 28, 2010.

reported below: ___ Mich App ___. The April 16, 2010, order is amended to read as follows:


Motion for Clarification Granted.

By order of November 19, 2009, the application for leave to appeal the January 27, 2009, judgment of the Court of Appeals was granted. On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been granted and the briefs of the parties having been considered, we vacate our order of November 19, 2009. Pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we affirm the result reached by the Court of Appeals in light of our decision in Robinson v City of Lansing, 486 Mich (Docket No. 138669, decided April 8, 2010), which held that the "two-inch rule" of MCL 691.1402a applies only to "county" highways. The parties to this case did not dispute that the road at issue is not a "county" highway. Therefore, in light of our decision in Robinson, the two-inch rule does not apply to this case. We thus vacate the opinion of the Court of Appeals because its analysis is dictum given our determination in Robinson that MCL 691.1402a applies only to "county" highways. We remand this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for further proceedings consistent with this order and Robinson. We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Gadigian v. City of Taylor

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 28, 2010
486 Mich. 936 (Mich. 2010)
Case details for

Gadigian v. City of Taylor

Case Details

Full title:GADIGIAN v. CITY OF TAYLOR

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: May 28, 2010

Citations

486 Mich. 936 (Mich. 2010)
798 N.W.2d 738

Citing Cases

Williams v. Twp. of Van Buren

While our Supreme Court affirmed the result that this Court reached in Gadigian, it vacated this Court's…