From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Funderbird-Day v. Artuz

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 4, 2002
97 Civ. 7786 (HB) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 4, 2002)

Opinion

97 Civ. 7786 (HB)

November 4, 2002


AMENDED OPINION ORDER


An opinion and order was issued in this case on October 29, 2002. It has since come to the Court's attention that a section from page one of that opinion is missing from the original that was filed with the Clerk of the Court. The following language should be inserted on page one after the paragraph ending with the citation to Grassia v. Scully, 892 F.2d 16, 19 (2d Cir. 1989):

DISCUSSION

The government objects to the RR's recommendation that the petition is timely. AEDPA requires that habeas petitions be filed within one year from the date of the judgment becoming final. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(A) (2000). The government contends, and petitioner


Summaries of

Funderbird-Day v. Artuz

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 4, 2002
97 Civ. 7786 (HB) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 4, 2002)
Case details for

Funderbird-Day v. Artuz

Case Details

Full title:RONALD FUNDERBIRD-DAY, Petitioner, v. CHRISTOPHER ARTUZ, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 4, 2002

Citations

97 Civ. 7786 (HB) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 4, 2002)

Citing Cases

Matthews v. Mazzuca

As to the miscarriage of justice claim, this is successful "in those extraordinary instances when a…

Kello v. Walsh

"A fundamental miscarriage of justice occurs only in those extraordinary instances when a constitutional…