From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fuller v. Nevada

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 12, 2020
Case No. 2:20-cv-00018-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Nov. 12, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:20-cv-00018-JAD-VCF

11-12-2020

MORGAN FULLER, Plaintiff v. STATE OF NEVADA, et. al., Defendants


Order Dismissing and Closing Case

[ECF No. 1]

Plaintiff Morgan Fuller brings this civil-rights lawsuit to redress constitutional violations that he claims he suffered while incarcerated by the Nevada Department of Corrections. On September 30, 2020, this Court ordered Fuller to update his address by October 30, 2020. That deadline expired without an updated address from the plaintiff, and his mail from this court is being returned as undeliverable.

ECF No. 3.

ECF No. 4.

District courts have the inherent power to control their dockets and "[i]n the exercise of that power, they may impose sanctions including, where appropriate . . . dismissal" of a case. A court may dismiss an action based on a party's failure to prosecute an action, failure to obey a court order, or failure to comply with local rules. In determining whether to dismiss an action on one of these grounds, the court must consider: (1) the public's interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court's need to manage its docket; (3) the risk of prejudice to the defendants; (4) the public policy favoring disposition of cases on their merits; and (5) the availability of less drastic alternatives.

Thompson v. Hous. Auth. of City of Los Angeles, 782 F.2d 829, 831 (9th Cir. 1986).

See Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53-54 (9th Cir. 1995) (dismissal for noncompliance with local rule); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (dismissal for failure to comply with an order requiring amendment of complaint); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988) (dismissal for failure to comply with local rule requiring pro se plaintiffs to keep court apprised of address); Malone v. U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987) (dismissal for failure to comply with court order); Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1424 (9th Cir. 1986) (dismissal for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with local rules).

Thompson, 782 F.2d at 831; Henderson, 779 F.2d at 1423-24; Malone, 833 F.2d at 130; Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1260-61; Ghazali, 46 F.3d at 53.

The first two factors, the public's interest in expeditiously resolving this litigation and the court's interest in managing its docket, weigh in favor of dismissal of the plaintiff's claims. The third factor, risk of prejudice to defendants, also weighs in favor of dismissal because a presumption of injury arises from the occurrence of unreasonable delay in filing a pleading ordered by the court or prosecuting an action. A court's warning to a party that its failure to obey the court's order will result in dismissal satisfies the fifth factor's "consideration of alternatives" requirement, and that warning was given here. The fourth factor—the public policy favoring disposition of cases on their merits—is greatly outweighed by the factors favoring dismissal.

See Anderson v. Air West, 542 F.2d 522, 524 (9th Cir. 1976).

Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262; Malone, 833 F.2d at 132-33; Henderson, 779 F.2d at 1424.

ECF Nos. 11, 13. --------

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that THIS ACTION IS DISMISSED without prejudice based on the plaintiff's failure to file an updated address in compliance with this Court's September 30, 2020, order, and the application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 1] is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE THIS CASE. Nothing else may be filed in this case. If Morgan Fuller wishes to pursue his claims, he must file a complaint in a new case.

Dated: November 12, 2020

/s/_________

U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey


Summaries of

Fuller v. Nevada

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 12, 2020
Case No. 2:20-cv-00018-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Nov. 12, 2020)
Case details for

Fuller v. Nevada

Case Details

Full title:MORGAN FULLER, Plaintiff v. STATE OF NEVADA, et. al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 12, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:20-cv-00018-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Nov. 12, 2020)