From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frontier Insurance Company v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 21, 2000
760 So. 2d 299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 3D98-2970.

Opinion filed June 21, 2000.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Maxine Cohen Lando, Judge; L.T. No. 98-4211.

Tarver Fernandez and Paige C. Tarver, for appellants.

Robert A. Ginsburg, Miami-Dade County Attorney and Jess M. McCarty, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FLETCHER and SORONDO, JJ.


This is an appeal by a surety from an order denying its application to set aside the forfeiture of an appearance bond. We affirm on the ground that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to hear the motion because it was brought before the court more than 65 days after the forfeiture. § 903.26(5), Fla. Stat. (1997); County Bonding Agency v. State, 724 So.2d 131 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). This conclusion makes it unnecessary to reach the other arguments advanced by the appellee.

Subsequent to the events in this case, the 35 day period provided by the 1997 version of the statute was extended to 60 days by a 1999 amendment to section 903.26(5). Even under that provision, however, the motion below was untimely heard.


Summaries of

Frontier Insurance Company v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 21, 2000
760 So. 2d 299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Frontier Insurance Company v. State

Case Details

Full title:FRONTIER INSURANCE COMPANY, as Principal, and JOEY G. BAIL BONDS, INC., as…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 21, 2000

Citations

760 So. 2d 299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Polakoff v. State

The amendment changed the time period to sixty days. Ch. 2000–178, § 4, Laws of Fla. The pertinent time…