From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frank v. Cnty. of Humboldt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 3, 2013
No. C 13-0089 MMC (N.D. Cal. May. 3, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 13-0089 MMC

05-03-2013

MINNY FRANK, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, et al., Defendants


ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND;

CONTINUING HEARING ON

DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Before the Court are three motions to dismiss filed, respectively, on February 1, 2013, March 22, 2013, and April 2, 2013, by defendants (1) David Williams and Jennifer Williams, (2) BHC Sierra Vista Hospital ("SVH") and Paul Hyppolite ("Hyppolite"), and (3) the County defendants, each such motion set for hearing on May 17, 2013. In her opposition to SVH and Hyppolite's motion, plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, requests leave to amend her complaint. (See, Opp'n, Doc. No. 44, filed Apr. 4, 2013, at 2:12-16.) Additionally, on April 28, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion to amend her complaint, noticed for hearing on May 17, 2013, and accompanied by a proposed amended complaint in which she has endeavored to address various deficiencies noted by defendants in their respective motions. Pursuant to the Civil Local Rules of this district, plaintiff's motion cannot be heard on a date earlier than June 7, 2013. See Civil L.R. 7-2(a) (providing motion "must be . . . noticed . . . on the motion calendar of the assigned Judge for hearing not less than 35 days after service").

The "County defendants" are the County of Humboldt, the Department of Health and Human Services, James Bragg, Christy Reihm, Katherine Young, Keri Schrock, Jery Scardini, Asha George, Chris Starets-foote, Donna Wheeler, Angela Monson and Shelley Nilsen.

Had plaintiff filed her motion earlier, she would have been entitled to amend her complaint once as of right. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B) (providing "[a] party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within . . . 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b)").

In light of the above, the Court hereby SETS the following dates for plaintiff's motion to amend:

1. Defendants' opposition(s), if any, shall be filed no later than May 17, 2013.

2. Plaintiff's reply, if any, shall be filed no later than May 24, 2013.

3. The hearing is hereby scheduled for June 14, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.

Due do sequestration, all district courts in the San Francisco division will be closed on June 7, 2013.
--------

In the interests of judicial economy, the hearings on the pending motions to dismiss are hereby CONTINUED to June 14, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Frank v. Cnty. of Humboldt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 3, 2013
No. C 13-0089 MMC (N.D. Cal. May. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Frank v. Cnty. of Humboldt

Case Details

Full title:MINNY FRANK, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 3, 2013

Citations

No. C 13-0089 MMC (N.D. Cal. May. 3, 2013)