From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frank v. Cnty. of Humboldt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 15, 2013
No. C 13-0089 MMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 13-0089 MMC

03-15-2013

MINNY FRANK, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, et al., Defendants


ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SERVE OPPOSITION ON DEFENDANTS;

CONTINUING HEARING

Before the Court is defendants David Williams and Jennifer Williams' (collectively, "the Williams") motion, filed February 1, 2013, to dismiss plaintiff's complaint. On February 11, 2013 plaintiff, acting pro se, filed opposition, but did not serve a copy of her opposition on the Williams. Unless and until the Williams appear electronically, all parties must serve all filed documents on the Williams by mail.

Although the Williams earlier requested leave to file and receive documents through the court's electronic filing system, and the Court granted that request, the Williams have not electronically filed notices stating they have received their e-filing passwords.

Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to serve her opposition to the motion to dismiss on the Williams by mail posted no later than March 22, 2013, and to file, on that same date, proof of said service.

The Williams shall file and serve on plaintiff, no later than April 5, 2013, any reply.

In light of the above, the hearing on the Williams' motion is continued from March 22, 2013 to April 19, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Frank v. Cnty. of Humboldt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 15, 2013
No. C 13-0089 MMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Frank v. Cnty. of Humboldt

Case Details

Full title:MINNY FRANK, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 15, 2013

Citations

No. C 13-0089 MMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2013)