Opinion
No. 67890
10-19-2015
DUSTIN DEAN FRANCIS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a jury verdict, of attempted grand larceny. Sixth Judicial District Court, Humboldt County; Michael Montero, Judge.
Appellant Dustin Dean Francis argues the district court abused its discretion in choosing to sentence him to a category D felony and a prison term rather than to a gross misdemeanor and probation. Francis asserts he should have received a lesser sentence because he accepted responsibility for the crime and pledged to atone for his actions. Francis' argument is without merit.
We review a district court's sentencing decision for abuse of discretion. See Chavez v. State, 125 Nev. 328, 348, 213 P.3d 476, 490 (2009). A review of the record reveals the district court noted Francis' criminal history, the available sentencing options, and then imposed a sentence of 12 to 32 months for Francis' conviction of attempted grand larceny as a category D felony. See NRS 193.330(4); NRS 205.222(2). Under these circumstances, we conclude the district court properly exercised its discretion when imposing Francis' sentence. Accordingly, we
The State asserts on appeal the district court should have sentenced Francis to a category C felony due to the value of the item Francis attempted to steal. We note the State did not object or otherwise attempt to correct the district court when it announced its decision to sentence Francis for a category D felony. Further, the record before this court does not provide any information regarding the jury's verdict in this regard. "This court on appeal must confine its review to the facts shown in the record." Lee
ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
/s/_________, C.J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Tao
/s/_________, J.
Silver
cc: Hon. Michael Montero, District Judge
Humboldt County Public Defender
Attorney General/Carson City
Humboldt County District Attorney
Humboldt County Clerk
v. Sheriff of Clark Cnty., 85 Nev. 379, 380, 455 P.2d 623, 624 (1969). Accordingly, we decline the State's request to order a new sentencing hearing in this matter.