Opinion
No. 09-11-00098-CV
Opinion Delivered June 30, 2011.
On Appeal from the 279th District Court Jefferson County, Texas, Trial Cause No. F-137,604.
Before McKEITHEN, C.J., GAULTNEY and KREGER, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Richard Francis filed a notice of appeal from a judgment of contempt. We questioned our jurisdiction over the appeal and instructed the parties to file written responses. This Court possesses original habeas jurisdiction in a case in which a person's liberty is restrained for a violation of an order, judgment, or decree in a civil case. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(d) (West 2004). Generally in such a case, neither appeal nor mandamus is the appropriate vehicle for relief; "a petition for writ of habeas corpus is generally the only method for attacking an order of contempt." In re Reece, No. 09-0520, 2011 WL 2112786, *7 (Tex. May 27, 2011) (citing Deramus v. Thornton, 160 Tex. 494, 333 S.W.2d 824, 827 (1960)). An appeal may be taken from an arrearage judgment. See In re B.A.T., No. 05-10-00593-CV, 2010 WL 3991426, *1 (Tex. App.-Dallas Oct. 11, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op). The arrearage judgment signed on December 8, 2010, was filed more than thirty days before Francis filed a notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Francis did not attempt to perfect an appeal within the time for which an extension may be granted for perfecting an appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. This Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
An original proceeding in habeas corpus has been filed and is proceeding separately from this appeal.
APPEAL DISMISSED.