From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fragosa v. Miller

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 17, 2012
95 A.D.3d 1524 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-05-17

In the Matter of Anthony FRAGOSA, Petitioner, v. Lt. J. MILLER, as Hearing Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Anthony Fragosa, Dannemora, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondent.


Anthony Fragosa, Dannemora, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

During a search of petitioner's cell, a correction officer found a piece of metal, approximately 2 1/4 inches long, sharpened on one end. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing a weapon. He was found guilty of the charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing, and the determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The detailed misbehavior report and visual inspection of the article in question provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Chiarappa v. Fischer, 84 A.D.3d 1628, 1629, 923 N.Y.S.2d 310 [2011]; Matter of Gonzalez v. Fischer, 53 A.D.3d 945, 945–946, 861 N.Y.S.2d 525 [2008] ). Although petitioner testified that he used the piece of metal to relieve stress by cutting himself, this is not a defense to the charge as it does not change the dangerous nature of the item. Moreover, upon reviewing the record, we find nothing to indicate that petitioner was denied a fair and impartial hearing or that the determination flowed from any alleged bias on the part of the Hearing Officer ( see Matter of McGowan v. Fischer, 88 A.D.3d 1038, 1039, 930 N.Y.S.2d 313 [2011]; Matter of Barnes v. Bezio, 86 A.D.3d 884, 885, 927 N.Y.S.2d 472 [2011] ). Petitioner's remaining procedural claims have not been preserved for our review.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

MERCURE, J.P., ROSE, MALONE JR., McCARTHY and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fragosa v. Miller

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 17, 2012
95 A.D.3d 1524 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Fragosa v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Anthony FRAGOSA, Petitioner, v. Lt. J. MILLER, as Hearing…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: May 17, 2012

Citations

95 A.D.3d 1524 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3909
943 N.Y.S.2d 918

Citing Cases

Starling v. N.Y. Dep't of Corr. & Cmty. Supervision

We confirm. The misbehavior report and supporting documentation provide substantial evidence to support the…

Fowler v. Fischer

denied19 N.Y.3d 807, 2012 WL 2401604 [2012];Matter of Pante v. Goord, 73 A.D.3d 1394, 1395, 902 N.Y.S.2d 684…