From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 24, 2008
53 A.D.3d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 503589.

July 24, 2008.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Romualdo Gonzalez, Auburn, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Spain, Carpinello, Kane and Malone Jr., JJ., concur.


Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of possession of a weapon. We now confirm.

The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence including the misbehavior report and related documentation, which established that a search of petitioner's cell recovered a round metal weapon that had been sharpened to a point and had a masking tape and cellophane handle ( See Matter of Moxley v Selsky, 45 AD3d 1084, 1084). Petitioner's claim of inadequate employee assistance is neither substantiated in the record nor is there any indication that he was prejudiced by any alleged deficiencies ( See Matter of Boley Selsky, 50 AD3d 1411, 1412). We have examined petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claim that he was denied the right to present witness testimony, and find them to be unpersuasive.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 24, 2008
53 A.D.3d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROMUALDO GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 24, 2008

Citations

53 A.D.3d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 6403
861 N.Y.S.2d 525

Citing Cases

Perretti v. Fischer

Petitioner was not entitled to access to the confidential information or to cross-examine those confidential…

Jackson v. Dubray

To the extent that petitioner offered a retaliation defense, a credibility issue was created for resolution…