From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fortner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 23, 2000
761 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 2D99-2658.

June 23, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County' Robert W. McDonald, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Bruce P. Taylor, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Sr., Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


In this Anders appeal we agree with the appellant's counsel that there are no meritorious issues requiring reversal. Appellant has requested, however, that we remand the case for clarification of the Order of Community Control Followed by Probation so that it conforms more precisely to the trial court's oral pronouncement of a special condition concerning drug treatment. The State has no objection to a remand for that purpose. Therefore, we remand for the trial court to modify the Order of Community Control Followed by Probation as follows: "All original terms remain in effect, except that drug treatment recommendations are limited to outpatient treatment. The defendant is to comply with all outpatient treatment as recommended."

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Affirmed, but remanded for clarification of Order of Community Control Followed by Probation.

GREEN, A.C.J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., (Senior) Judge, Concur.


Summaries of

Fortner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 23, 2000
761 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Fortner v. State

Case Details

Full title:Micah C. FORTNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 23, 2000

Citations

761 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)