From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flores v. Lynch

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 27, 2016
631 F. App'x 485 (9th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 13-73906

01-27-2016

JULIO C. FLORES, AKA Julio Flores, AKA Little Diablo Flores, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Agency No. A070-715-159 MEMORANDUM On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Julio C. Flores, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Medina-Lara v. Holder, 771 F.3d 1106, 1111 (9th Cir. 2014), and we grant the petition for review and remand.

Under the modified categorical approach, the government has not met its burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that Flores was convicted of possessing cocaine base. See id. at 1113. The amended complaint, which charged Flores with a violation of California Health & Safety Code § 11350(a), is the only document in the record that specifies that cocaine base was the drug at issue. The minute order dated February 6, 2013 records Flores's nolo contendere plea to "Count 1," but does not specify whether that count was set forth in the amended complaint, or the original complaint, which is not in the record. In fact, the minute order states that Flores pleaded not guilty to the amended complaint. Because the government has submitted only the amended complaint and the link between it and the minute order is ambiguous, the government has not satisfied its burden of proof. See id. at 1114-15 (the government failed to carry its burden where alternate explanations for ambiguities in the record were plausible, even though the record did not suggest petitioner possessed any substance other than one controlled by federal law).

We grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.


Summaries of

Flores v. Lynch

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 27, 2016
631 F. App'x 485 (9th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Flores v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:JULIO C. FLORES, AKA Julio Flores, AKA Little Diablo Flores, Petitioner…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 27, 2016

Citations

631 F. App'x 485 (9th Cir. 2016)