From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flood v. Zucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 12, 1977
58 A.D.2d 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

July 12, 1977


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on April 15, 1977, granting plaintiff's motion for leave to amend his bill of particulars and increase the ad damnum clause in his complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The papers submitted at Special Term were factually sufficient to warrant the relief awarded. A sufficient excuse for the delay in seeking such relief and merit to plaintiff's cause were shown, as was justification for the increase in the ad damnum clause. Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on April 15, 1977, severing the third-party action from the main action, unanimously reversed, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and motion denied, without costs and without disbursements. The third-party defendant did not adequately establish that it would be prejudiced if required to proceed to trial.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Lupiano, Birns and Capozzoli, JJ.


Summaries of

Flood v. Zucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 12, 1977
58 A.D.2d 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

Flood v. Zucker

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH FLOOD, Respondent, v. DONALD ZUCKER et al., Appellants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1977

Citations

58 A.D.2d 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

619 Hancock Parking Corp. v. 619 Hancock Street

In the instant case, "[t]he third-party defendant did not adequately establish that it would be prejudiced if…