From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flanery v. Mendoza-Powers

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 15, 2008
1:06-cv-00059-LJO-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2008)

Opinion


MICHAEL EUGENE FLANERY, Plaintiff, v. MENDOZA-POWERS, et al., Defendants. No. 1:06-cv-00059-LJO-GSA-PC. United States District Court, E.D. California. October 15, 2008

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 11.)

         ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

         ORDER FOR CLERK TO CLOSE CASE

          LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.

         Michael Eugene Flanery ("plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

         On September 4, 2008, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that this action be dismissed based on plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under section 1983. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations within twenty days. To date, plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations.

The United States Postal Service returned the order on September 15, 2008 as undeliverable. A notation on the envelope indicated "RETURN TO SENDER - NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED - UNABLE TO FORWARD". However, plaintiff has not notified the court of any change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party's prior address is fully effective. Local Rule 83-182(f)

         In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

         Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

         1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on September 4, 2008, are adopted in full;

         2. This action is dismissed with prejudice, based on plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under section 1983; and

         3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Flanery v. Mendoza-Powers

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 15, 2008
1:06-cv-00059-LJO-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2008)
Case details for

Flanery v. Mendoza-Powers

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL EUGENE FLANERY, Plaintiff, v. MENDOZA-POWERS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 15, 2008

Citations

1:06-cv-00059-LJO-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2008)