From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fisk v. Copeland

Superior Court for Law and Equity, Winchester District
Apr 1, 1809
1 Tenn. 383 (Tenn. Ch. 1809)

Opinion

April 1809.

The admissions of a partner not sued are evidence against the other partner, though the suit may not be in the name of the firm.

HAMILTON, for plaintiff.


Covenant for the delivery of staves. It was proved that Stowel was a partner of Fisk's in merchandise; that the consideration of this covenant was merchandise, and that Stowel carried the staves down the river for the purpose of sale. It was moved to prove what Stowel had said respecting the receipt of the staves.


In partnership transactions, the acknowledgments of any out concerned in interest may be received in evidence, though the suit may not be in the name of the firm.

1 Tyler. 452; Taunton, 104; 2 Bay, 533.


HARRIS and BARRY, for defendant.


Summaries of

Fisk v. Copeland

Superior Court for Law and Equity, Winchester District
Apr 1, 1809
1 Tenn. 383 (Tenn. Ch. 1809)
Case details for

Fisk v. Copeland

Case Details

Full title:FISK v. COPELAND

Court:Superior Court for Law and Equity, Winchester District

Date published: Apr 1, 1809

Citations

1 Tenn. 383 (Tenn. Ch. 1809)

Citing Cases

McMillan v. Richards

)          In Birch v. Wright, (1 Tenn. 383,) the point was adjudged directly, and the Court said: " The…