From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fiorello v. Towers Management Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 20, 1958
6 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

May 20, 1958


Order unanimously reversed on the facts and as a matter of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, and judgment is directed to be entered dismissing the complaint. This determination is without prejudice to an application by plaintiff-respondent for appropriate relief on proper papers, including an affidavit of merits by the plaintiff, and upon payment of the costs on this appeal and the costs incident to the dismissal of this action. We have repeatedly held that to successfully resist a motion of this kind plaintiff must submit papers demonstrating a reasonably substantial excuse for the failure to prosecute buttressed by an affidavit of merits by the plaintiff. The record in this case fails to disclose any affidavit of merits. ( Rist v. 234 East 33rd Corp., 4 A.D.2d 867; Fischetti v. 242 East 19th St. Corp., 4 A.D.2d 867.)

Concur — Botein, P.J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.


Summaries of

Fiorello v. Towers Management Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 20, 1958
6 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

Fiorello v. Towers Management Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CARMINE FIORELLO, Respondent, v. TOWERS MANAGEMENT CORP., Appellant, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 20, 1958

Citations

6 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Citing Cases

Whitton v. Steppes Beauticians Inc.

Were the excuse for the delay reasonable, the motion would nevertheless be granted as there is no affidavit…

Stein v. West Sayville Pharmacy, Inc.

Plaintiffs failed to submit any papers explaining their failure, for a period of 34 months after joinder of…