From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rist v. 234 East 33rd Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 22, 1957
4 A.D.2d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Opinion

October 22, 1957


Order unanimously reversed on the facts and as a matter of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted, and judgment is directed to be entered dismissing the complaint, with costs. Despite recent admonitions by this court that on a motion such as this there must be a substantial showing of valid excuse or justification for delay, together with an affidavit of merits by the party plaintiff ( Hyde Sons v. Roller Derby Skate Co., 1 A.D.2d 942; Davis v. Cunard S.S. Co., 284 App. Div. 1036; Cooper v. Schnabolk, 283 App. Div. 937), the record in this case is lacking in both. Indeed, even from the attorney's affidavit (which alone would not be sufficient), one cannot glean the nature of the accident or the manner in which it occurred, let alone determine whether there is merit to the cause of action.

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Botein, Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.


Summaries of

Rist v. 234 East 33rd Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 22, 1957
4 A.D.2d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)
Case details for

Rist v. 234 East 33rd Corp.

Case Details

Full title:GRACE RIST, Respondent, v. 234 EAST 33RD CORP., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 22, 1957

Citations

4 A.D.2d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Citing Cases

Weigert v. Regal Advertising Associates Corp.

Earlier, in August 1971, a request for a stipulation to restore had been declined by counsel for defendants…

Waldman v. Cedar Management Corp.

Order unanimously modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, so as to dismiss the complaint…