From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fed. Power Com. v. Pan American

U.S.
May 20, 1968
391 U.S. 363 (1968)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT.

No. 227.

Decided May 20, 1968.

Together with No. 415, Long Island Lighting Co. et al v. Pan American Petroleum Corp. et al., also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court.

Certiorari granted; 376 F.2d 161, vacated and remanded.

Solicitor General Marshall, Richard A. Solomon, Peter H. Schiff, and Joel Yohalem for petitioner in No. 227. Bertram D. Moll and Morton L. Simons for Long Island Lighting Co., Samuel Graff Miller for Philadelphia Electric Co., and Kent H. Brown for Public Service Commission of the State of New York, petitioners in No. 415.

J. P. Hammond, William J. Grove, Carroll L. Gilliam, and Philip R. Ehrenkranz for Pan American Petroleum Corp., Cecil N. Cook and Neal Powers, Jr., for Cockrell et al., Cecil E. Munn for General American Oil Co. of Texas, Bruce R. Merrill and Thomas H. Burton for Continental Oil Co., H. H. Hillyer, Jr., for J. Ray McDermott Co., Inc., Oliver L. Stone and Thomas G. Johnson for Shell Oil Co., Murray Christian and H. W. Varner for Superior Oil Co., and Paul W. Hicks, Robert W. Henderson, and Donald K. Young for Placid Oil Co. et al., respondents in both cases.



The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted and the judgments are vacated. The cases are remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of Federal Power Commission v. Sunray DX Oil Co., ante, p. 9.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.


Summaries of

Fed. Power Com. v. Pan American

U.S.
May 20, 1968
391 U.S. 363 (1968)
Case details for

Fed. Power Com. v. Pan American

Case Details

Full title:FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION v . PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM CORP. ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 20, 1968

Citations

391 U.S. 363 (1968)

Citing Cases

Schultz v. McGroarty

"First, the employee must show that the activity is in fact protected." Id. (citing Pickering v. Board of…

Rendish v. City of Tacoma

123 F.3d at 1225. Yet this court has unequivocally held that, under Connick and Pickering v. Board of Educ.,…