From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fahima v. Gonzales

United States District Court, S.D. California
Dec 26, 2007
CASE NO. 07 CV 1777 JM (CAB) (S.D. Cal. Dec. 26, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 07 CV 1777 JM (CAB).

December 26, 2007


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS


Plaintiff brought this mandamus action to compel the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service ("CIS") to adjudicate her I-485 application to adjust status. On December 12, 2007, Plaintiff filed a motion to withdraw her complaint because CIS adjudicated her application. Defendants filed a noticed of non-opposition to Plaintiff's motion. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("FRCP") Rule 41(a)(2), the court construes Plaintiff's motion as a motion to dismiss and hereby GRANTS dismissal.

The court also notes that Plaintiff could have voluntarily dismissed the action without a court order under FRCP Rule 41(a)(1). Rule 41(a)(1) requires only a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties, prior to service of an answer or motion for summary judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fahima v. Gonzales

United States District Court, S.D. California
Dec 26, 2007
CASE NO. 07 CV 1777 JM (CAB) (S.D. Cal. Dec. 26, 2007)
Case details for

Fahima v. Gonzales

Case Details

Full title:MALI FAHIMA, Plaintiff, v. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. California

Date published: Dec 26, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 07 CV 1777 JM (CAB) (S.D. Cal. Dec. 26, 2007)