From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fagin v. Grossinger S H Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 12, 1963
20 A.D.2d 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

December 12, 1963

Appeal from the Erie Special Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, McClusky, Henry and Noonan, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to either party, and motion granted, without costs. Memorandum: The affidavit of the plaintiff-respondent failed to set forth facts demonstrating that there was a meritorious cause of action. In this respect it was deficient. Furthermore, there was no sufficient explanation in any of respondents' papers of the untimely delay in moving and prosecuting the case. ( Gallagher v. Clafington, Inc., 7 A.D.2d 627; Biondo v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co., 3 A.D.2d 640.) Therefore, in the exercise of a provident discretion, the motion should be granted.


Summaries of

Fagin v. Grossinger S H Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 12, 1963
20 A.D.2d 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Fagin v. Grossinger S H Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LAURA FAGIN et al., Respondents, v. GROSSINGER S H INC., et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 12, 1963

Citations

20 A.D.2d 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Citing Cases

Monette v. Bonsall

Thus, the motion is unsupported by a required affidavit of merits, and, as far as liability is concerned,…