From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Biondo v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 19, 1956
3 A.D.2d 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Opinion

December 19, 1956

Appeal from the Monroe County Court.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Bastow, JJ.


Order reversed on the law and facts and as a matter of discretion, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs. Memorandum: In view of plaintiffs' unexplained and unexcused neglect to bring the action on for trial for 44 months, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute. All concur.


Summaries of

Biondo v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 19, 1956
3 A.D.2d 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)
Case details for

Biondo v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH BIONDO et al., Doing Business as OASIS CAFE, Respondents, v. NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 19, 1956

Citations

3 A.D.2d 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Citing Cases

McCombs v. Kauffman

Order reversed on the law and facts, without costs of this appeal to either party, and motion granted,…

Fagin v. Grossinger S H Inc.

Furthermore, there was no sufficient explanation in any of respondents' papers of the untimely delay in…