From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Kenyon

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo
Apr 7, 2005
No. 07-05-0117-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 7, 2005)

Opinion

No. 07-05-0117-CR

April 7, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal from the 154th District Court of Lamb County, No. 16,536, Hon. Felix Klein, Presiding.

Order of Dismissal

Panel D: Before QUINN, REAVIS, and CAMPBELL, JJ.


Harland P. Kenyon appeals from an order dismissing his application for writ of habeas corpus. The writ was sought to obtain release from the purported restraint of Bruce Peel, mayor of Littlefield, Texas. Peel had moved for dismissal, contending that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the proceedings. The trial court granted the motion. We now dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. One may not appeal from an order denying a writ of habeas corpus unless the order arose after a hearing on the merits and the trial court denied the application on the merits. Ex parte Hargett, 819 S.W.2d 866, 868 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). Next, granting a motion to dismiss due to the absence of jurisdiction is not a ruling on the merits. See Bland Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Blue, 34 S.W.3d 547, 554 (Tex. 2000); see also City of Lubbock v. Rule, 68 S.W.3d 853, 857 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 2002, no pet.). So because the trial court dismissed the appeal due to the lack of jurisdiction, we ourselves have no jurisdiction over the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Kenyon

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo
Apr 7, 2005
No. 07-05-0117-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 7, 2005)
Case details for

Ex Parte Kenyon

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte HARLAND P. KENYON, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo

Date published: Apr 7, 2005

Citations

No. 07-05-0117-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 7, 2005)