From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate of Paone v. Plymouth Twp.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 5, 2022
Civil Action 22-2178 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 5, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-2178

12-05-2022

ESTATE OF MICHAEL TRISTIAN PAONE, deceased, by and through the Administrators of the Estate, MICHAEL PAONE, JR. and LISA PAONE; LISA PAONE, individually; and JULIANA PAONE, individually, Plaintiffs, v. PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP and PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP POLICE OFFICERS DOES 1-10, Defendants.


ORDER

Berle M. Schiller, J.

AND NOW, on this 5th day of December 2022, upon consideration of Defendant Plymouth Township's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint in Part (ECF 9), the Response in Opposition by Plaintiffs, the Estate of Michael Tristian Paone, deceased, by and through the Administrators of the estate, Michael Paone Jr. and Lisa Paone; Lisa Paone, individually; and Juliana Paone, individually (ECF 10), and the Township's Response in Support of its Motion (ECF 11), and consistent with the accompanying Memorandum of Law, it is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is GRANTED and:

1. Plaintiffs' section 1983 claims against the Township (Counts I, II, III, V and VI) are DISMISSED. Plaintiffs may amend their section 1983 excessive force claim against the Township if they can allege sufficient facts to state a basis for Monell liability;

2. Plaintiffs' claims against the Township for a conspiracy to interfere with civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) (Count IV) and for neglect pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1986 (Count VII) are DISMISSED with leave to amend to the extent that Plaintiffs can allege sufficient facts to state a plausible claim for relief;

3. Plaintiffs' state law claims against the Township for survival (Count VIII), and wrongful death (Count IX), assault and battery (Count X), negligent infliction of emotional distress (Count XII), and intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count XIII) are DISMISSED with prejudice.

4. Plaintiffs may file a Second Amended Complaint consistent with this Order and the accompanying Memorandum, if any, or notify the Court that they will proceed on their remaining claims on or before Tuesday, December 27, 2022.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that, because Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint (ECF 8), the Motion to Dismiss filed at ECF 5 is DISMISSED as MOOT.


Summaries of

Estate of Paone v. Plymouth Twp.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 5, 2022
Civil Action 22-2178 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Estate of Paone v. Plymouth Twp.

Case Details

Full title:ESTATE OF MICHAEL TRISTIAN PAONE, deceased, by and through the…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 5, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 22-2178 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 5, 2022)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. City of Seattle

; Ward v. City of San Jose, 967 F.2d 280, 284-85 (9th Cir. 1991); see also Estate of Paone v. Plymouth…

Johnson v. City of Seattle

. The United States Supreme Court, however, has made clear that claims of excessive force during the course…