From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Era Inv. v. Sipilovic

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Nov 13, 2008
No. 02-08-302-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 13, 2008)

Opinion

No. 02-08-302-CV

DELIVERED: November 13, 2008.

Appealed from the 96th District Court of Tarrant County.

PANEL: HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


We have considered the "Joint Motion to Set Aside Judgment and Remand Pursuant to Settlement" filed by appellant and appellees. It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted. Accordingly, without regard to the merits, we vacate the trial court's judgment and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of a judgment in accordance with the parties' settlement agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); Innovative Office Sys., Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W.2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995).

Appellant ERA Investments, L.L.C., and Appellees Wanda Sipilovic and America's Market, Inc. shall each pay half of the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.


Summaries of

Era Inv. v. Sipilovic

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Nov 13, 2008
No. 02-08-302-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 13, 2008)
Case details for

Era Inv. v. Sipilovic

Case Details

Full title:ERA INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., APPELLANT v. WANDA SIPILOVIC AND AMERICA'S…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Nov 13, 2008

Citations

No. 02-08-302-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 13, 2008)