From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Epps v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Feb 9, 1999
510 S.E.2d 279 (Va. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

Record No. 0665-97-2

February, 9, 1999

Upon a Rehearing En Banc Circuit Court No. CR-97-416-00-M.

Anthony G. Spencer (Morchower, Luxton Whaley, on briefs), Richmond, for appellant.

H. Elizabeth Shaffer, Assistant Attorney General Mark L. Earley, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Before Chief Judge Fitzpatrick, Judges Benton, Coleman, Willis, Elder, Bray, Annunziata, Bumgardner, Lemons and Senior Judge Overton.

Judge Overton participated in the hearing and decision of this case prior to the effective date of his retirement on January 31, 1999 and thereafter by his designation as senior judge pursuant to Code § 17.1-401, recodifying Code § 17-116.01:1.


A divided panel of this Court affirmed the judgment of the trial court. See Epps v. Commonwealth, 28 Va. App. 58, 502 S.E.2d 140 (1998). We stayed the mandate of that decision and granted rehearing en banc.

Upon rehearing en banc, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed without opinion by an evenly divided Court. Accordingly, the opinion previously rendered by a panel of this Court on July 21, 1998 is withdrawn and the mandate entered on that date is vacated. Chief Judge Fitzpatrick, Judges Benton, Coleman, Bray and Annunziata voted to reverse the judgment of the trial court. Judges Willis, Elder, Overton, Bumgardner and Lemons voted to affirm said judgment.

This order shall be published and certified to the trial court.


Summaries of

Epps v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Feb 9, 1999
510 S.E.2d 279 (Va. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Epps v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:MARK EVANS EPPS, APPELLANT, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Virginia

Date published: Feb 9, 1999

Citations

510 S.E.2d 279 (Va. Ct. App. 1999)
510 S.E.2d 279

Citing Cases

Bennett v. Commonwealth

The Epps opinion was withdrawn following a hearing en banc and is not binding on this Court. Epps v.…