From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Enriquez v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 20, 2018
No. 74240 (Nev. App. Jul. 20, 2018)

Opinion

No. 74240

07-20-2018

MARK SIOSON ENRIQUEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Mark Sioson Enriquez appeals from an order of the district court denying the motion to correct an illegal sentence filed on July 21, 2017. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Connie J. Steinheimer, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument and we conclude the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. NRAP 34(f)(3), (g). --------

In his motion, Enriquez claimed his sentence was illegal because the language in the judgment of conviction did not exactly follow the language in the statutes under which he was convicted. Enriquez failed to demonstrate his sentence was facially illegal or the district court lacked jurisdiction. See Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Enriquez' sentence falls within the parameters of the statute under which he was convicted, see NRS 205.46513(2), and there is no requirement that the judgment of conviction use the exact language found in the statute. Therefore, we conclude the district court did not err by denying Enriquez' motion, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge

Mark Sioson Enriquez

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe County District Attorney

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Enriquez v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 20, 2018
No. 74240 (Nev. App. Jul. 20, 2018)
Case details for

Enriquez v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARK SIOSON ENRIQUEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 20, 2018

Citations

No. 74240 (Nev. App. Jul. 20, 2018)