From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Emrit v. Jules

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 28, 2023
No. 23-1514 (4th Cir. Jul. 28, 2023)

Opinion

23-1514

07-28-2023

RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SABINE AISHA JULES, Defendant-Appellee.

Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: July 25, 2023

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Kimberly Anne Swank, Magistrate Judge. (5:23-cv-00179-FL)

Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WYNN and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Satish Emrit seeks to appeal from the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Emrit seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Haney v. Addison, 175 F.3d 1217, 1219 (10th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Emrit v. Jules

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 28, 2023
No. 23-1514 (4th Cir. Jul. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Emrit v. Jules

Case Details

Full title:RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SABINE AISHA JULES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jul 28, 2023

Citations

No. 23-1514 (4th Cir. Jul. 28, 2023)

Citing Cases

Dubar v. Hanks

Accordingly, the court cannot exercise jurisdiction on the basis of diversity of citizenship because…

Dubar v. Hanks

Accordingly, the court cannot exercise jurisdiction on the basis of diversity of citizenship because…