From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elias v. Benavidez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 15, 2022
2:17-cv-02106-WBS-DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2022)

Opinion

2:17-cv-02106-WBS-DB P

11-15-2022

KEIRON M. ELIAS, Plaintiff, v. JENNIFER BENAVIDEZ, Defendant.


ORDER

DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff proceeds pro se with a claim for prospective injunctive relief under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”). The time for filing dispositive motions has expired and the dispositive motion previously filed is resolved. Before the court sets a further schedule for this litigation, including due dates for pretrial statements, the court inquires as to each party's position on the usefulness of scheduling a settlement conference, which may take place via videoconference.

On October 27, 2021, the court appointed limited purpose counsel to represent plaintiff. (ECF No. 56.) Pursuant to the terms of that order, counsel's appointment terminated on October 25, 2022, when the court ruled on defendant's March 11, 2021 motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 73.)

This case was previously referred to the court's Post-Screening ADR Project but no settlement conference was held. (ECF Nos. 30, 33, 34.)

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within 14 days of the date of this order, each party shall file a notice briefly stating whether or not the party believes scheduling a settlement conference would be useful at this time.


Summaries of

Elias v. Benavidez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 15, 2022
2:17-cv-02106-WBS-DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Elias v. Benavidez

Case Details

Full title:KEIRON M. ELIAS, Plaintiff, v. JENNIFER BENAVIDEZ, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 15, 2022

Citations

2:17-cv-02106-WBS-DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2022)