From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edwards v. Swarthout

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 4, 2022
2:13-cv-02218 DAD DB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2022)

Opinion

2:13-cv-02218 DAD DB P

10-04-2022

DAVID EDWARDS, Plaintiff, v. SWARTHOUT, Defendant.


ORDER

L DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff David Edwards, an inmate proceeding with counsel, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Parties have filed a joint motion for status conference in the present action. (ECF No. 53.) As this request appears appropriate, the court will grant parties' motion for status conference.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Parties' joint motion for status conference (ECF No. 53) is granted.

2. A Status Conference is set for Friday, November 4, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in Courtroom No. 27 before the undersigned.

Parties shall appear at the Status Conference either telephonically or over video conference through the Zoom application (which is free and must be downloaded to your computer or mobile device prior to the hearing). Parties proceeding in propria persona, on his or her own behalf, shall DB/DB Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/edwa2218.ossc contact Mamendella York, the courtroom deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge at (916) 930-4128, no sooner than 4 days prior to the noticed or continued hearing date but no later than 48 hours prior to the hearing, to arrange their appearance either telephonically or over video conference. Counsel will receive an email containing the necessary appearance information and must notify the courtroom deputy no later than 48 hours prior to the hearing to elect to appear either telephonically or over video conference. The Zoom ID Number and password are confidential and are not to be given to anyone. Persons granted remote access to these proceedings, whether by Zoom or by telephone, are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the court.

3. Plaintiffs shall file and serve a status report on or before October 21, 2022, and defendant shall file and serve a status report on or before October 28, 2022. Each party's status report shall identify for the court the matters and issues the parties wish to address at the status conference.

4. The parties are cautioned that failure to file a status report or failure to appear at the status conference may result in an order imposing an appropriate sanction. See Local Rules 110 and 183.


Summaries of

Edwards v. Swarthout

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 4, 2022
2:13-cv-02218 DAD DB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2022)
Case details for

Edwards v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:DAVID EDWARDS, Plaintiff, v. SWARTHOUT, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 4, 2022

Citations

2:13-cv-02218 DAD DB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2022)