From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edelman v. Arcola Realty Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

March, 1930.


Order denying plaintiffs' motion to direct the clerk to advance the case upon the calendar reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, motion granted, with ten dollars costs, and the clerk directed to place the case on the day calendar for March 31, 1930. The record herein discloses that the action is upon a contract and that plaintiffs have complied with all the requirements of rule 10 of Queens County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules, adopted pursuant to section 83 Jud. of the Judiciary Law, thus entitling them to the advancement of the case upon the calendar. ( Williams v. Tompkins, Inc., 209 App. Div. 546.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Amd. by Laws of 1922, chap. 390. — [REP.


Summaries of

Edelman v. Arcola Realty Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Edelman v. Arcola Realty Corporation

Case Details

Full title:NORMAN J. EDELMAN and SAMUEL S. TOBACK, Appellants, v. ARCOLA REALTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1930

Citations

228 App. Div. 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Citing Cases

Hanley v. Byrne Bros., Inc.

Appellants contend that under the circumstances present, neither Special Term, Part I, nor Trial Term, Part…