From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Echavarria v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Jan 4, 2021
NUMBER 13-20-00576-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 4, 2021)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-20-00576-CR

01-04-2021

RUBEN ECHAVARRIA, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.


On appeal from the 156th District Court of Bee County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Silva
Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Ruben Echavarria, has filed a notice of appeal with this Court from his conviction in trial court cause number B-18-2009-0-CR-B. The trial court's certification of the defendant's right to appeal shows that the defendant does not have the right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that a defendant has a right of appeal is not made a part of the record. Id. R. 25.2(d); see id. R. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. The purpose of the certification requirement is to efficiently sort appealable cases from non-appealable cases so that appealable cases can "move through the system unhindered while eliminating, at an early stage, the time and expense associated with non-appealable cases." Greenwell v. Ct. of Apps. for the Thirteenth Jud. Dist., 159 S.W.3d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see Hargesheimer v. State, 182 S.W.3d 906, 912 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

Within thirty days of date of this notice, appellant's lead appellate counsel, Hon. Joseph Stephens, is hereby ORDERED to: 1) review the record; 2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and 3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel's findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal and/or advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification. If appellant's counsel determines that appellant has a right to appeal, counsel is further ORDERED to file a motion with this Court within thirty days of this notice, identifying and explaining substantive reasons why appellant has a right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3, 44.4; Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614-15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also, e.g., Carroll v. State, 119 S.W.3d 838, 841 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.) (certification form provided in appendix to appellate rules may be modified to reflect that defendant has right of appeal under circumstances not addressed by the form). The motion must include an analysis of the applicable case law, and any factual allegations therein must be true and supported by the record. See Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 614-15; cf. Woods v. State, 108 S.W.3d 314, 316 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (construing former appellate rule 25.2(b)(3) and holding that recitations in the notice of appeal must be true and supported by the record). Copies of record documents necessary to evaluate the alleged error in the certification affecting appellant's right to appeal shall be attached to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1, 10.2.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 4th day of January, 2021.


Summaries of

Echavarria v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Jan 4, 2021
NUMBER 13-20-00576-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Echavarria v. State

Case Details

Full title:RUBEN ECHAVARRIA, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Jan 4, 2021

Citations

NUMBER 13-20-00576-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 4, 2021)