From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Easley v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Dec 16, 2022
352 So. 3d 542 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

Case No. 5D22-1831.

12-16-2022

Ricardo EASLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Ricardo Easley, Palm Coast, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.


Ricardo Easley, Palm Coast, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We issued a Spencer show cause order directing Appellant to demonstrate why he should not be prohibited from filing any appeal, petition, pleading, or motion pertaining to the conviction and sentence rendered in Case No. 2015-CF-1144 unless reviewed and signed by an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Florida. Having failed to file a response and thus failing to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that Appellant is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings.

State v. Spencer , 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

Therefore, in order to conserve judicial resources, we prohibit Appellant from filing with this Court any further pro se pleadings concerning Marion County Fifth Judicial Circuit case number 2015-CF-1144. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning this case and not to accept any telephone or in-person communications. Any further pleadings regarding this case will be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless they are filed by a member in good standing with The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) ("Enough is enough.").

FURTHER PRO SE FILINGS PROHIBITED.

EDWARDS, EISNAUGLE, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Easley v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Dec 16, 2022
352 So. 3d 542 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Easley v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICARDO EASLEY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District

Date published: Dec 16, 2022

Citations

352 So. 3d 542 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)