From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Earp v. Perritte

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Nov 7, 2012
2012-UP-605 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 7, 2012)

Opinion

2012-UP-605

11-07-2012

Bobbie Earp, Respondent, v. Sean Perritte, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2011-204626

Merrill A. Cox, of Cox Law Firm, of Goose Creek, for Appellant. Bobbie Earp, pro se, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted October 26, 2012

Appeal From Berkeley County Jack A. Landis, Family Court Judge

Merrill A. Cox, of Cox Law Firm, of Goose Creek, for Appellant.

Bobbie Earp, pro se, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Sean Perritte appeals the family court's denial of his motion in reference to bankruptcy. Perritte argues an automatic stay in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy bars the continuation of an order of incarceration for civil contempt for failure to pay child support. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: King v. King, 384 S.C. 134, 142, 681 S.E.2d 609, 614 (Ct. App. 2009) (holding issues must be raised to and ruled upon by the family court to be preserved for appellate review); Bodkin v. Bodkin, 388 S.C. 203, 219, 694 S.E.2d 230, 239 (Ct. App. 2010) (holding when the family court fails to rule on an issue presented, the issue must be raised in a Rule 59(e), SCRCP, motion to be preserved for review).

AFFIRMED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

SHORT, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Earp v. Perritte

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Nov 7, 2012
2012-UP-605 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Earp v. Perritte

Case Details

Full title:Bobbie Earp, Respondent, v. Sean Perritte, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Nov 7, 2012

Citations

2012-UP-605 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 7, 2012)