From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

E. M. v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 30, 2021
20-cv-02272-JCS (N.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-02272-JCS

09-30-2021

E.M., Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR COMMISSIONER'S MOTION

RE: DKT. NOS. 40

JOSEPH C. SPERO, CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This case was filed on April 3, 2020, approximately a year and a half ago. Defendant the Commissioner of Social Security did not file the administrative record (dkt. 27) until April 13, 2021, more than a year after the case was filed, and only after the Court granted in part an opposed fourth request for an extension of that deadline on the condition that a senior official would be required to appear at a sanctions hearing if the record was not filed as ordered. See dkt. 24.

Plaintiff E.M. filed his motion for summary judgment on June 14, 2021. Dkt. 32.In granting a second stipulation to extend time for the Commissioner's motion, which set a deadline of September 29, 2021, the Court advised the parties that "[n]o further extensions of this deadline will be granted as a matter of course," and that "[i]f the Commissioner needs additional time, the parties may request a case management conference to discuss a feasible case schedule." Dkt. 39.

E.M.'s statement of the administrative record was not filed until June 25, 2021.

Tina Naicker, counsel for the Commissioner has since faced exigent circumstances due to serious family health issues over the past two weeks. Rather than request a case management conference as required by the previous order, however, the parties waited until the day the Commissioner's motion was due to file a stipulation for a further one-week extension. Dkt. 40.

As with the final request for an extension of time to file the administrative record, the timing of this request leave the Court little choice between granting it (despite the previous order to the contrary) or imposing fairly severe consequences. Notwithstanding the parties' failure to follow the Court's previous order, Naicker's family obligations are sufficient grounds for a further extension. Naicker's workload, with more than seventy-five active cases and more than three dispositive motions due per week, also raises concerns as to her ability to meet this and other deadlines.

The stipulation is GRANTED, and the Commissioner's motion and statement of the administrative record shall be filed no later than October 6, 2021. If that deadline is not met, however, the Court will require Regional Chief Counsel Deborah Stachel to appear for a case management conference to discuss a feasible schedule.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

E. M. v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 30, 2021
20-cv-02272-JCS (N.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2021)
Case details for

E. M. v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:E.M., Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 30, 2021

Citations

20-cv-02272-JCS (N.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2021)